In 1996, California voters approved Proposition 215, which made it legal for people with a doctor’s recommendation to use marijuana for medical purposes. Because the act did not say how patients could obtain marijuana other than to grow it themselves, in 2003, the legislature passed the Medical Marijuana Program Act, which authorized patients and caregivers to cultivate and distribute marijuana as collectives or cooperatives, but not for profit. Unfortunately, some organizers operated just like private for-profit businesses. These operations have given a bad name to the patients and caregivers who wish to operate within the law.
But even after sixteen years, the law is still vague on some points and many issues are being fought out in the courts. Given that, there are some basic guidelines to follow for setting up a medical marijuana organization like a dispensary, delivery service, or growing facility consistent with the law.
Dispensing, possessing, and cultivating medical marijuana is still prohibited under federal law. Therefore, federal law enforcement officials may still prosecute you, even though you are in compliance with California and local law. On a recent visit to Oakland, US Attorney General Eric Holder said that the Obama administration would leave medical marijuana suppliers alone if they were complying with state law. Of course, this is no guarantee. It is, however, a good reason to do your best to comply with state law. Here is how to do that.
Become a qualified patient or caregiver. All members of medical marijuana collectives or cooperatives must be qualified patients or the primary caregiver of a qualified patient in the collective or cooperative. To be a qualified patient, you need a doctor’s recommendation. A “primary caregiver” is defined as “the individual designated by the [patient] who has consistently assumed responsibility for the housing, health, or safety of that person.” A primary caregiver is not just your pot dealer.
Become a not-for-profit cooperative or a collective. The law is not clear on what type of organization qualifies as a medical marijuana cooperative or collective. Most patient groups choose to organize themselves under the California consumer cooperative statute or the California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation statute. State law says that marijuana shall not be cultivated or distributed for profit. This is somewhat vague, but probably means that there should be no outside investors who make a dividend and no one should be compensated at outrageously high levels.
However, technically, the entity itself can’t cultivate marijuana. Only patients and their caregivers are exempt from prosecution for cultivation — the entity that they form is NOT. Therefore, individual members of the cooperative may cultivate marijuana and the cooperative may facilitate transactions between the members so that those who can’t cultivate marijuana themselves can receive marijuana from those members that can. In practical terms, this means that the cooperative should not hire employees or contractors who are not members of the cooperative to cultivate marijuana.
Find a location. This is probably the most complicated part. Every local government treats medical marijuana cooperatives and collectives differently. While local governments cannot regulate what patients and their caregivers do in the privacy of their own home with a limited number of plants as long as it does not cause a nuisance, setting up a larger facility will require compliance with local business licensing and zoning laws.
Although it is still being disputed, recent cases have been granting cities and counties the right to prohibit dispensaries and similar operations altogether, and most in the East Bay have either banned dispensaries or limited them in number. Until this issue is settled, you should check to see if the city in which you want to locate has a ban or moratorium in place. For instance, ordinances regulating dispensaries may not apply to delivery services.
Other cities simply do not have a zoning process for medical marijuana organizations and will not issue business permits without that zoning clearance. However, you need a business permit to legally operate a commercial-type facility or activity. Some collectives have chosen to open without zoning clearance or a business permit, but cities have civilly prosecuted dispensaries without permits or zoning clearance as public nuisances.
The definitions of various types of medical marijuana organizations varies from city to city. In Oakland, for instance, a dispensary is any collective or cooperative with four or more patients or caregivers who facilitate or assist in the lawful production, acquisition, or distribution of medical cannabis.
Your best bet is to open in a city that explicitly allows it and find out what the requirements are to do so. In many cities getting a permit to operate a medical marijuana facility is a highly competitive process due to the limited number of permits allowed.
Operate by the books: Once you’ve formed your collective and are operating legally under local law, there are lots of practices you can adopt to minimize the risk of attention from federal, state, and local regulators.
Obtain a state seller’s permit and pay sales tax.
Create a system to ensure that all members have a current valid doctor’s recommendation.
Only do business with members.
Have security precautions in place to prevent theft, loitering, and other nuisances.
Find an accountant who understands medical marijuana dispensaries.
It is important to pay attention to all the details. Remember, the government got Al Capone for income-tax evasion — not bootlegging.
Excellent article. Looking forward to seeing you write more articles about this subject.
Well, I hope you will keep updating your content constantly as you have one dedicated reader here.
I have a different view, but I respect you for sharing this story.
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
http://mc374ll.info/
I was so frustrated beacuse I couldn`t resolve this issue. Then I found your site in google and problem is solved. Thanks!
It’ll be so sweet when the NY Giants win the superbowl at Cowboys’ Stadium! SOOO pumped for football season.
Thanks for your visiting this http://www.glamour-watch.com/rolex-watches online store.
l’excellent matériel.
The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.
Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.
Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.
If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.
Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.
This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.
Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.
This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.
I really loved reading your blog. It was very well authored and easy to undertand. Unlike additional blogs I have read which are really not tht good. I also found your posts very interesting. In fact after reading, I had to go show it to my friend and she ejoyed it as well!
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.
If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.
Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.
I’m impressed!! Really informative blog post here my friend. I just wanted to comment & say keep up the quality work. I’ve bookmarked your blog just now and I’ll be back to read more in the future my friend! Also nice colors on the layout, it’s really easy on the eyes.
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.